応用哲学会発表賞の審査項目とガイドライン

【1次審査】

@発表の学術的意義(計14点)

A.学術的意義のある発表となっているか。(7点)

B.発表の学術的意義が十分に説明されているか。(7点)

A発表の応用哲学への貢献(計7点)

A.応用哲学への貢献につながる発表となっているか。

B発表の明確性、説得性(計14点)

A.研究の内容が明確に述べられているか。(7点)

B.結論が説得的に裏づけられているか。(7点)

【2次審査】

1次審査の@ABに加えて次の点.

C発表の技量(計21点)

A.発表が分かりやすく、かつ効果的になされている。(14点)

B.質問の内容を理解し、適切に応答している。(7点)

Selection Criteria for Best Presentation Award

[First-stage selection]

(1) Academic significance (14 points in total)

A.Does the presentation have academic significance? (7 points)

B.Does the presentation adequately explain its significance? (7 points)

(2) Contribution to the development of applied philosophy (7 points in total)

A.Does the presentation contribute to the development of applied philosophy? (7 points)

(3) Clarity and persuasiveness (14 points in total)

A.Are the claims in the presentation stated clearly? (7 points)

B.Are the conclusions of the presentation supported by sufficient grounds? (7 points)

[Second-stage selection]

(1), (2), and (3) are the same in the first-stage selection.

(4) Presentation Skills(21 points in total)

A.Does the presenter deliver the material concisely and effectively? (14 points)

B.Does the presenter understand and answer questions properly? (7 points)